Comment: I brought this book from the library for the simple reason that it was a short one. The edition I read had less than 180 pages.
Steinn and Solrunn meet by chance at a hotel where they had stayed years ago as a young couple. They separated and both have led different lives, with different partners and ideas but seeing each other again brought back all the memories and the pain that led to their separation. While they reconnect through emails, the same old wounds are back as well.. can they cope with this newfound friendship again or will the connection only end up as bitterly as before?
In my teenager years I remember having read Sophie's World, the book that gave this author fame. It has been decades but I still remember how provocative it was for me then and how original it had seemed at the time, all the philosophy mixed up with apparently simple juvenile stuff. Realistically, I knew this would not be so, considering the age of the protagonists but I won't hide it that part of me kind of expected to get some of same feelings Sophie's World had given me.
This book is quite small, like I said, and it is about a couple that reconnects after many years. They had been a couple in love but something happened to separate them. What happened is only hinted at throughout the emails exchange and only really revealed at the end but it does seem it has to be something shocking because that even not only separated them but has also driven them both to move on with living with different views.
Steinn remained as clinical and scientifically inclined as they both had been before this situation, but Solrunn started seeing signs in some things, namely the title of a specific book and in how religion can suit one's POV. Now, after a life in which they both found other people and had children and have tried to cope with the terrible event in opposed ways, everything comes back and to be honest, I never imagined the reason for their break up was that one.
Of course it has to be something that could impact someone's look at the world, and I really cannot say how I would cope, if I would, with such a thing. The psychological impact is impossible to deny and I cannot recall if any of them did any therapy but I assume not because this would probably have played out in such a way that exchanging the emails they do might contain other type of information. Certainly, the festering of such a wound, so to speak, was a huge fodder for how the re-connection developed.
As expected, considering the author's work, there is quite an interesting philosophical debate ongoing but to be honest, not really as impressive as I hoped, because in attempting to prove each other's beliefs, the kind of things they write are just too impersonal and abstract if this were to be a real email exchange between people who still have some residue of emotions and who never dealt with the pain of their mutual devastation. I mean, I get why the author chose this tactic but it was unrealistic.
I was actually a little bored by this because if what happened had been so terrible, how could they be this wasteful with the emails - would be different if the book had been much longer - and I was thinking the book would not go past three stars but then they finally mention the terrible event and yes, it can be life changing. My curiosity was peaked and I wondered how the author would end the book and then, bam!, another situation that changed everything again! Nothing really was explained after because the book pretty much ends, but it certainly gave me food for thought.











