Then by chance Chloe discovers her employers are anything but the entrepreneurs they appear, and suddenly she knows far too much. Her clients are illegal arms dealers, and one of them is ordered to kill her. But instead, Bastien Toussaint drags Chloe away, and the next thing she knows she's on the run with the most terrifying and seductive man she's ever met. What were his motives--and would she live long enough to find out?
Comment: I got this book at a book exchange site (Bookmooch) years ago... I no longer remember why, but probably it was because the main character is a translator, like me! This month I had a topic in a challenge I'm doing with one of my GR groups and we had to read a book with a cover that indicated winter. Thus, ta-da.
Last month I've read a book by one of this author's pseudonyms, Kristina Douglas. I've found that book to be average to me, considering my current preferences. While I was reading that one I've realized I also had this Black Ice in the pile, by the same author, but in a different genre and name. I was quite eager to read this one, then, if only to compare my overall experience, and now that I did, I can say I find both names equally average in how I respond.
The story has a good enough premise, although slightly annoying to me: the translator this conference should hire would have been an interpreter because in such situations, there are specific translator professionals for specific types of translation work. But anyway, this is fiction and the amount of languages Chloe knows not very important after all. I also read a review by a friend ans she commented why would this unknown translator even be there, if the people had such need of privacy and spoke English in common? The idea is, therefore, relatively interesting and I was eager to see scenes with her working, but in reality there weren't that many situations where this is visible, and I assume the female protagonist's "skill" was only the means to justify her presence there.
The fact the male protagonist is a so-called anti-hero, meaning he does bad things for a higher purpose without sharing that with the heroine, is not a type of plot that seduces me anymore. I remember having found this idea fun in the past, mostly in movies, because the danger and romance combination was quite out of the ordinary, but reading about Bastian kind of annoyed me. Well, many things annoyed me and I'll group all those things into the simple fact that the writer's "voice" didn't compel me and I just could not avoid thinking about the details I wanted to rant about.
Well, Bastian annoyed me for the same reason "heroes" who are anti-heroes often do: why would such a clever, skilled and resourceful person want to do the job he does? Why not being clever enough to make other choices? I know reality bears no importance in these novels or romances, but my brain cannot turn off these thoughts. This means that, to me, Bastian playing the role of this bad guy who has no other way of living is annoying as everything. Plus, how on Earth should I believe him helping Chloe and all the things that happen afterwards makes sense?
Yes, I was not convinced by the "romance" and the way this is written just didn't make it possible for me to focus on this world, I kept letting reality intrude and make me think about what they should do instead. I had the same feeling when I've read a different book, an historical, by this author, but I had also liked another one much better. Perhaps my impression of the author's ability to convince me of what the characters are doing/feeling does not match what I prefer in contemporary settings. I think there are too many dramatic and fast paced scenes here to make this an enjoyable romance development. I cannot believe in a HEA just by the way these two interact and if I start dreaming about what life they could have together after the last page is turned, there isn't one in which I can believe they have enough in common, personality wise, to make it work.
I think I've felt so dissociated from what was being told that I could read this book and not be as invested in what was happening anyway. But, of course, the more I think about details, the more irritated I get, for instance even the whole shady business the conference is about, some of the things some characters said annoyed me so much as well... the real world is full of highly improbable issues humankind can solve easily, and to have these characters talk about their illegal business when the same effort could be used to solve problems instead.... well, I felt both annoyed at the plot and uncaring for the main couple that the quicker I'd finish, the better.
I have the first couple of books in this series in the print TBR, but the more I read about these books, the less I want to read them. Ah, well.
ReplyDeleteBetter luck with the next one!
Hi! Nothing like trying, of course, but if you were to pick something else instead, it would prove to be a better enjoyment of your time...
DeleteWhen I read a character that has my job or area I have specific knowledge of, its tough for me too, to turn off parts of my knowledge and get into that fictional world.
ReplyDeleteHi! I think I could have overlooked that if the rest had been amazing. Some books, if they are ebooks, are much easier to "erase" from the TBR from time to time... but with physical books, I feel I need to at least try them before I give them away, for instance.
DeleteOh man, this is so true! (and, in on of those coincidences, all the Ann Stuarts I have, all TBR, are in print ::head desk:: )
DeleteI'm actually eager for next year, when it's time for the annual book fair I attend in Lisbon, around June, because I already have a few paperbacks to take to a used bookstore which opened recently, and they buy used books. For a symbolic price of course, but at least I'll be rid of them without having to throw them away. They also sell those used books so I'm also eager to see if something catches my eye.
Delete